Skip to main content

FDA to grade products' health claims

Teachers won't be the only ones issuing grades from now on. The Food and Drug Administration plans to start grading health claims on product labels.

The ranking system will assign letter grades - ranging from 'A' to 'D' - on each claim a company makes, indicating the quality and strength of the scientific evidence that supports the claim.

'We want to see more of a focus on getting that information out to consumers and we want to see more of a focus on food producers competing based on the health consequences of their products,' says FDA Commissioner Dr. Mark McClellan.



The measure is intended to encourage the manufacturers of foods, beverages and dietary supplements to present only health claims that are firmly backed by sound science. An FDA spokesperson said the new grades are intended to inform consumers about the products they buy.

But consumers won't see the changes right away. 'The new regulations take effect in September, but it'll likely be months after that before consumers see any change in their food labels,' reports ABCNEWS correspondent Lisa Stark.

Health Claim Report Card

Under the new plan, an 'A' grade will be assigned to claims supported by many well-designed studies. For instance, if a food high in fiber boasts the ability to one's reduce risk of colon cancer, the claim will be given an 'A' since the link between fiber and gastrointestinal cancers has been well established by scientific research.

Health claims with 'good' but not entirely 'conclusive' supporting evidence will be assigned a 'B' designation. Label statements made with little or no conclusive evidence to back them up will fall into 'C' and 'D' categories.

This new proposal does not censor the health claims; rather, it retains claims while noting their strength. The measure might have been prompted by the 1999 court decision, Pearson v. Shalala, which requires the FDA to permit all truthful and non-misleading health information on herbal supplement labels, says Dr. Alice Lichtenstein, director and senior scientist at the Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory at Tufts University in Medford, Mass.

'The system is an excellent approach,' says Dr. David Katz, director of Yale University's Prevention Research Center in New Haven, Conn.

Katz says the program will be particularly helpful because consumers are becoming increasingly responsible for reaching their own health-care decisions, which may often be based on direct-to-consumer advertising. This initiative would provide consumers with information in a recognizable way so that they are informed about what it is they are buying.

A changing and flexible grading system can also mirror the advances made in science as new health claims are studied and explored, adds Lichtenstein. Consumers could therefore be kept up to speed on the latest scientific evidence and what they are buying.

Noralyn Wilson, a registered dietitian and spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association, believes consumers will be well-protected by this particular measure, particularly people who consume dietary supplements. 'The FDA is just trying to get its arms around it [the dietary supplement industry],' she says.

Consumer Concern

Currently, only health claims proven conclusively through science are printed on product labels. Some experts say that this new measure is a step in the wrong direction.

'Today's FDA action lowers the standard for making health claims and it means that health claims on food packages will be less reliable. The agency is presenting a marketing advantage to the food companies at the expense of consumer welfare,' says Bruce Silverglade of the Washington-based Center for Science in the Public Interest.

'I think the grading system is going to make American shoppers even more confused about nutrition,' says Jeffrey Hampl, a registered dietitian at Arizona State University in Mesa. 'Shoppers won't be paying close attention to the A, B, C or D. They'll see the health claim and base their decision to buy on that.'

Other experts assert that a passing out letter grades may not be so easily applied to health promises as it is to students, and believe that only claims for which there is sound scientific proof should be allowed on labels.

'No more fables on labels, please,' says Dr. Keith-Thomas Ayoob, associate professor of nutrition at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. He contends that because claims receiving 'C' and 'D' statements are not sufficiently backed by scientific research, they simply have no place on a product label.

Although expert opinions are mixed, all agree that consumers deserve to be informed. '[We] need to focus resources in answering these uncertainties,' says Lichtenstein, 'and potentially modify the system on the basis of what is learned.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is too much soy bad for men?

While soy may be beneficial to women in a variety of ways, research in monkeys suggests that it could have an adverse effect on the behavior of men, according to researchers from Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center. Reporting in the current issue of the scientific journal Hormones and Behavior, the researchers found that in male monkeys, "long-term consumption of a diet rich in soy isoflavones can have marked influences on patterns of aggression and social behavior." Isoflavones are a naturally occurring plant estrogen in soy protein. "Although considerable attention has been directed at the potentially beneficial effects of isoflavones in reducing the risk of various cancers, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and postmenopausal symptoms, less effort has been invested in characterizing neurobehavioral effects," according to the study.

Dietary modification could be a simple way to reduce the risk of stroke

Dietary modification could be a simple way to reduce the risk of stroke say researchers. The research shows a diet that consists of meats, refined grains and desserts is associated with a greater risk for stroke than a diet of fruits, vegetables, fish, legumes and whole grains. The study included dietary information on 71,768 female nurses between 38 and 63 years old. The women had no history of heart disease or diabetes. They completed questionnaires about their diet every few years for 14 years. Researchers tracked how many of the women had a stroke and then compared their diets. They rated the women's diets based on if they ate more of a Western diet or a prudent diet. During the follow-up, 791 women in the study had had a stroke. It was found that women who ate a Western diet vs. a prudent diet had a higher risk of developing a stroke . They say those who had the highest scores for a Western diet, meaning they mainly ate meat, refined grains and sweets, had a more than 50

Patient wins right to stop doctors withdrawing food and drink when he can no longer speak

Leslie Burke, who has a degenerative brain condition (cerebellar ataxia), was concerned that doctors may one day withdraw food and drink when he could no longer speak. He has won a high court ruling which says the doctors cannot do that. Leslie wants to go on living for as long as he can, even when he loses his ability to communicate his wishes to people around him. According to UK General Medical Council guidance on providing artificial nutrition, Leslie thought there might be situations in which life saving food and drink could be withdrawn, even if this went against his wishes. If his situation got so that he could not speak, the present guidance could allow doctors to remove food and drink. Now the General Medical Council will have to re-write the guidance as a result of the new High Court ruling. This new ruling applies to all terminally ill patients and also patients who lose the ability to speak and communicate their wishes to doctors. The General Medical Council can appea