Skip to main content

What Is The Difference Between Food Allergy And Food Intolerance?

By
Most people can eat a wide range of food without any problems. But there is a small group of people allergic to particular foods or ingredients in foods. The allergic reaction can range from minor skin irritations to serious allergic shocks.

An allergy means that a person's immune system shows an excessive defence reaction to substances which in themselves are harmless - it has "forgotten" how to distinguish between harmful and harmless substances.

The symptoms of an allergic reaction vary considerably. The most frequent complaints occur shortly after eating, either in the form of prickling or swelling in the mouth or throat, or as a skin rash.

Allergic reactions in the gastro-intestinal tract, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea or constipation, occur in relatively few cases.

More seldom still are shock reactions (anaphylactic shock). These can bring about circulatory failure, which must be treated immediately by a doctor.

A food allergy is one thing - a food intolerance is another. A food intolerance can produce symptoms very much like those of food allergy, but the immune system is not involved in these reactions in the same way. If you have a food intolerance, your body is unable to digest a certain kind of food or some ingredient in a food, e.g. because the required enzyme is absent or inactive.

Since the digestive system is involved in most cases, the principal symptoms of food intolerance (such as lactose intolerance - link to the same topic) are flatulence, gastro-intestinal pains and diarrhoea. Allergies and food intolerances can appear in many different degrees of severity.

Under certain circumstances it is urgently advisable to consult a doctor specialised in allergology, who will be able to determine the exact causes and draw up an individual diet plan together with a dietitian.

www.eufic.org
www.foodexperts.net

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is too much soy bad for men?

By
While soy may be beneficial to women in a variety of ways, research in monkeys suggests that it could have an adverse effect on the behavior of men, according to researchers from Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center. Reporting in the current issue of the scientific journal Hormones and Behavior, the researchers found that in male monkeys, "long-term consumption of a diet rich in soy isoflavones can have marked influences on patterns of aggression and social behavior." Isoflavones are a naturally occurring plant estrogen in soy protein. "Although considerable attention has been directed at the potentially beneficial effects of isoflavones in reducing the risk of various cancers, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and postmenopausal symptoms, less effort has been invested in characterizing neurobehavioral effects," according to the study.
4 comments
Read more

Dietary modification could be a simple way to reduce the risk of stroke

By
Dietary modification could be a simple way to reduce the risk of stroke say researchers. The research shows a diet that consists of meats, refined grains and desserts is associated with a greater risk for stroke than a diet of fruits, vegetables, fish, legumes and whole grains. The study included dietary information on 71,768 female nurses between 38 and 63 years old. The women had no history of heart disease or diabetes. They completed questionnaires about their diet every few years for 14 years. Researchers tracked how many of the women had a stroke and then compared their diets. They rated the women's diets based on if they ate more of a Western diet or a prudent diet. During the follow-up, 791 women in the study had had a stroke. It was found that women who ate a Western diet vs. a prudent diet had a higher risk of developing a stroke . They say those who had the highest scores for a Western diet, meaning they mainly ate meat, refined grains and sweets, had a more than 50...
Post a Comment
Read more

Patient wins right to stop doctors withdrawing food and drink when he can no longer speak

By
Leslie Burke, who has a degenerative brain condition (cerebellar ataxia), was concerned that doctors may one day withdraw food and drink when he could no longer speak. He has won a high court ruling which says the doctors cannot do that. Leslie wants to go on living for as long as he can, even when he loses his ability to communicate his wishes to people around him. According to UK General Medical Council guidance on providing artificial nutrition, Leslie thought there might be situations in which life saving food and drink could be withdrawn, even if this went against his wishes. If his situation got so that he could not speak, the present guidance could allow doctors to remove food and drink. Now the General Medical Council will have to re-write the guidance as a result of the new High Court ruling. This new ruling applies to all terminally ill patients and also patients who lose the ability to speak and communicate their wishes to doctors. The General Medical Council can appea...
Post a Comment
Read more